Heroes with Gyros and other O-plurals

You say, “potato,” and I say, “potatoes.”

Then you say, “dynamo,” and I say, “dynamos.”

The English language is filled with odd exceptions, particularly for correct spellings.

A group of superheroes would have to eat a big bunch of super-gyros to figure out all of these plural closings for words that end in “o.”

Oh, my! There it goes – with all those uh-ohs!

Take a look:

albinos

altos

avocados

banjos

cantos

casinos

cellos

curios

dynamos

echoes

embargoes

Eskimos

Filipinos

gyros

halos

heroes

infernos

kangaroos

kilos

kimonos

lassos

logos

memos

patios

photos

pianos

Picassos

piccolos

potatoes

provisos

quartos

radios

rodeos

solos

sombreros

stilettos

superheroes

tacos

tobaccos

tomatoes

torpedoes

torsos

typos

vetoes

zoos

OK, it gets worse.

Some words ending with “o” may be pluralized with or without the addition of an “e.” IN such cases, both ways are considered correct

buffaloes / buffalos (or even just “buffalo,” as in “Oh, give me a home, where the buffalo roam.”)

dominoes / dominos

ghettoes / ghetto

innuendoes / innuendos

mangoes / mangos

mosquitoes / mosquitos

mottoes / mottos

tornadoes / tornados

volcanoes / volcanos

 

Then there’s more. Watch out for homonyms!

Consider this example: When the accountant zeroes in on our monthly expenses, he usually comes up with a few extra zeros.

Even a spell-checker won’t tag that one.

Pass the dictionary, would you, please?

Related Items:

• Idioms Unpacked: Eat Your Words
• Idioms Unpacked: Hell Bent for Leather
• Idioms Unpacked: Let the Cat Out of the Bag
• Idioms Unpacked: Well-Heeled

 

 Image/s:  

Superheroes by Digital Rampage

Creative Commons Licensing/Wikipedia Commons Photos

Feel free to follow on GooglePlus and Twitter. You are also invited to join this writer's fan page, as well as the Chicago Etiquette Examiner, Madison Holidays Examiner, Equestrian Examiner and Madison Equestrian Examiner on Facebook.

Beware of reposting photos, poems and stories without permission.

Looks like it’s time for a back-to-basics primer on copyright infringement, particularly with the holiday season approaching.

Cute cartoons, fun photos, clever poems, and heartwarming stories circulate on social networking sites. Forwards of forwards fill our email boxes.

Thanksgiving, Christmas, Hanukkah, New Year’s Eve, and the rest of the winter holiday whirlwind seem to draw an ever-increasing number of re-shared content.

We like what we see, so we pass these gems along.

But are we pick-pocketing the actual content creators when we share their work without permission?

Indeed, we are.

Whether we know it or not, reposting or republishing copyrighted materials is a form of piracy – not unlike unlicensed music or video downloads. And it robs the original authors, artists, or photographers.

Copyright infringement is painful, even if it’s unintentional.

Each week, I discover my own articles, poems, stories, photography, and other published work on a host of websites without my permission. Frequently, items are put up by well-intentioned folks, who simply appreciate what they have read and want to share it. 

Occasionally, the trespass is deliberate. Most often, however, I like to believe people simply don't know the laws about intellectual property.

Obviously, as a writer, I count it both encouraging and flattering to learn that folks are actually reading my words. At the same time, I often find myself trying to educate people about copyright rules.

Like most wordsmiths, I don’t wrack (or rack) my brain and pound my computer keyboard for free, even if the creative and original weaving of words brings me joy and personal fulfillment.

Well-meaning copyright infringement just struck another writer.

A kind and ethical friend posted a sweet poem on a Facebook special-interest group page, indicating that the author was unknown. Using a quick Google search on the first stanza, I quickly found the author, who is alive and well and currently writing.

The material is still under copyright, although the rhymed verses appear all over the internet. Poetry sites, social networking communities, and all sorts of blogs carry the lines. It’s unlikely that the poet has granted so many permissions, diluting the search engine rankings of her work with so many appearances of it.

If this poet should choose to create a compilation of her favorite works, potential publishers may frown on the overabundance of previous postings of it. (Often, more than three appearances can be seen as overexposure of previously published work under consideration for inclusion in a new book.)

 

When is online sharing of copyrighted work acceptable?

It's generally OK to hit “SHARE” on a Facebook page or reTweet a linked Twitter post, as that shares only the introduction and carries the initial link, directing readers to the original work.

Super-Simple Linking (Bookmark This Post)

It’s perfectly acceptable to post the title first few lines with a hyperlink to the original work online. Usually, anything over 100 words (for prose) is off-limits. Poetry is trickier to call, especially short couplets, limericks, or haikus.

Copying and republishing without the creator’s OK crosses the legal line.

Readers: Please stop before you share.

Go ahead and pass along online links, sending your own followers to writers’ published material. Or ask for permission upfront before copying and putting up work that legally belongs to its creator. Many writers approve this for nominal fees, or even for free, when due credit is given.

But it pays to ask … so the right person is paid.

That’s copyright law in action, and it’s the right thing to do.

Image/s:  

From: The Fortune Teller

By Georges de la Tour

Circa 1636

Public Domain Artwork

Feel free to follow on GooglePlus and Twitter. You are also invited to join this writer's fan page, as well as the Chicago Etiquette Examiner, Madison Holidays Examiner, Equestrian Examiner,  Madison Equestrian Examiner, and Working in Words on Facebook.