How much of a writer’s own personality goes into his or her
work? And how does this contribute to (or detract from) creative authenticity?
Do written words ring truest when they represent the author’s own personal
hopes, dreams, conceptions, misconceptions, ideals, prejudices, and other idiosyncrasies?
American novelist and literary critic John Updike (1932-2009)
apparently believed they do. Consider this Updike quotation:
“The
measure of artistic merit is the length to which a writer is willing to go in following
his own compulsions.”
John Updike may be best
remembered for these popular works: Couples, Rabbit at Rest, Rabbit Is Rich, Rabbit Redux, Rabbit Remembered, Rabbit, Run, The Centaur, and The Witches of Eastwick.
According to Updike, author authenticity may trump other
virtues (or lack thereof). Here’s another quote to support this idea:
“Writers may be disreputable, incorrigible,
early to decay or late to bloom but they dare to go it alone.”
In the end, however, the Rabbit
author would likely have said excellence is worth plenty, particularly when
it is applied to one’s professional pursuit, as this Updike statement suggests:
“Any activity becomes creative when the
doer cares about doing it right or better.
Image/s:
A to Z Blogging Challenge
promo logo – fair use
Graphic adapted from
public domain image
Feel free to follow on GooglePlus and Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Have related insights, ideas, or a story to share? Feel free to comment, and let Working in Words know you were here.