Where do we start with this desecrated phrase?
First, grammatically,
it’s a mess.
Each one may be worse
than the next, but not worst. It
doesn’t even matter what sort of entity “one” is used to describe.
What’s more, the
meaning is shot.
The intent of this oft-used phrase is usually aimed at
describing deterioration, not improvement.
Think about it.
If each one is actually worse than the next, then things
must be better than they were before.
But that’s not what people usually have in mind when the say
it.
Each one’s worse than
the last.
That’s more like it – at least, from a language statement.
Still, it’d be nice to see things take an upturn and make the too-often
desecrated phrasing moot.
Life can always improve, and it often does, even if language
seems to grow ever sloppier.
Be sure to follow or bookmark this blog/site,
so you won't miss a single post in the series:
50 Mistreated Words and Desecrated Phrases.
Image/s:
Created by this user
Feel free to follow on GooglePlus and Twitter. You are also
invited to join this writer's fan
page, as well as the Chicago Etiquette Examiner, Madison Holidays Examiner, Equestrian
Examiner and Madison
Equestrian Examiner on Facebook.
I've actually had arguments with people over this very phrase. People who insisted they were well educated. They often claim that it's a matter of "lingual drift". The introduction of the definition "radical or awes-inspiring" in regards to the word "cool" is lingual drift. This phrase is just... sacrilege.
ReplyDelete